中国政治文化研究：不同公民群体的危机压力比较

图书

检索

图书详情

首页

英文文献

中国政治文化研究：不同公民群体的危机压力比较

Research on Chinese Political Culture: A Comparison of Crisis Stress among Different Citizen Groups

作者：

田华史卫民

分类：

政治学政治学理论

关键词：

政治文化研究中国

出版日期：2019-09-01

ISBN：978-7-5203-3850-9

页数：396

点击量：8

立即阅读

扫码跳转手机端阅读

内容简介
书籍目录

内容简介

在中国政治文化的研究中，引入科学的指标体系，并通过连续性的全国问卷调查，显现各种指数的变动情况，对于全面理解政治文化的基本走向具有重要的参考价值。

2012年中国社会科学院政治学研究所的全国性问卷调查和2016年南开大学当代中国问题研究院的全国性问卷调查，都与中国政治文化指数有密切的关系。本书是对两次问卷调查结果进行比较的研究成果之三，重点是对不同公民群体的危机压力情况作出综合评估。

本书用两次问卷调查的数据，说明了在危机压力方面，因公民性别、民族、年龄、学历、政治面貌、职业、户籍、单位、收入、区域的不同，以及公民对不同民主的偏好不同，会显现出一定的差异。尤其需要注意的是，问卷调查较突出地显示了公民的性别、年龄、学历、政治面貌、所在单位、收入水平、所在区域不同以及公民对不同民主的偏好，都会带来危机压力的显著差异。

基于问卷调查反映的不同公民群体的危机压力差异，还需要持续性的问卷调查加以进一步的验证，但本书所提供的各种基础数据，对于相关问题的教学和研究，应能提供重要的帮助，并使更多的人持续关注政治学的量化研究成果。

In the study of Chinese political culture, the introduction of a scientific index system and the display of changes in various indexes through continuous national questionnaire surveys have important reference value for a comprehensive understanding of the basic trend of political culture. The 2012 national questionnaire survey of the Institute of Political Science of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and the 2016 national questionnaire survey of the Institute of Contemporary China Studies of Nankai University are closely related to the Chinese political culture index. This book is the third of a comparative survey of the two questionnaires, focusing on a comprehensive assessment of crisis stress situations among different groups of citizens. This book uses the data of two questionnaires to illustrate that in terms of crisis pressure, there are certain differences in citizens' gender, ethnicity, age, education, political appearance, occupation, household registration, employer, income, region, and citizens' preferences for different democracies. In particular, it should be noted that the questionnaire shows more prominently that citizens' gender, age, education, political affiliation, employer, income level, region and preference for different democracies will bring about significant differences in crisis pressure. Based on the differences in crisis pressure of different citizen groups reflected in questionnaire surveys, continuous questionnaires are needed to further verify, but the various basic data provided in this book should provide important help for teaching and research on related issues, and make more people continue to pay attention to the quantitative research results of political science.