中文 English

图书详情

首页

英文文献

我的书架

当前位置: 首页 > 图书详情

《四库全书总目》学术思想与方法论研究

赵涛[著]

《四库全书总目》 学术思想 研究 方法论

2016-11-01

978-7-5161-8979-5

452

4

扫码阅读

  • 内容简介
  • 书籍目录
  • 作者简介
  • 参考文献
内容简介

中国古籍目录不仅限于著录历代典籍的存与亡,而且还反映历代学术发展、演变的状况,叙列学术发展的脉络、源流,评价人品、学术之优劣、短长。编纂于清代乾隆时期的中国古代最大的古籍目录《四库全书总目》,是古典文化进入成熟、总结阶段的精品,它既蕴藏着中国古代学术文化生成、流变的轨迹,又涵容着中国传统学术文化心态以及清代前期文化思想精神,蕴涵着丰富的学术思想和学术方法。本书主要通过对翁方纲、姚鼐、邵晋涵、余集四家分纂官所撰分纂稿与《四库全书总目》进行比勘和分析,从学术史、思想史视角研析影响《四库全书总目》学术思想和方法论的历史与学理因素,揭示和诠释《四库全书总目》学术思想及方法论的内涵和实质,阐释和评价其经学论、史学论、诸子学论、文学论的意义和价值。本书考、论结合,宏观与微观相彰,力求从基本材料入手,得出一些新的结论。
中国古籍目录不仅限于著录历代典籍的存与亡,而且还反映历代学术发展、演变的状况,叙列学术发展的脉络、源流,评价人品、学术之优劣、短长。编纂于清代乾隆时期的中国古代最大的古籍目录《四库全书总目》,是古典文化进入成熟、总结阶段的精品,它既蕴藏着中国古代学术文化生成、流变的轨迹,又涵容着中国传统学术文化心态以及清代前期文化思想精神,蕴涵着丰富的学术思想和学术方法。本书主要通过对翁方纲、姚鼐、邵晋涵、余集四家分纂官所撰分纂稿与《四库全书总目》进行比勘和分析,从学术史、思想史视角研析影响《四库全书总目》学术思想和方法论的历史与学理因素,揭示和诠释《四库全书总目》学术思想及方法论的内涵和实质,阐释和评价其经学论、史学论、诸子学论、文学论的意义和价值。本书考、论结合,宏观与微观相彰,力求从基本材料入手,得出一些新的结论。

The catalogue of ancient Chinese books is not limited to the survival and death of the classics of the past dynasties, but also reflects the development and evolution of scholarship throughout the ages, lists the context and source of academic development, and evaluates the character and academic advantages and disadvantages, short and long. The Siku Quanshu General Bibliography, the largest catalogue of ancient ancient books in ancient China, compiled in the Qianlong period of the Qing Dynasty, is a fine product of classical culture entering the stage of maturity and summary, which not only contains the trajectory of the generation and flow of ancient Chinese academic culture, but also contains the traditional Chinese academic cultural mentality and the spirit of cultural thought in the early Qing Dynasty, and contains rich academic ideas and academic methods. This book mainly compares and analyzes the manuscripts written by Weng Fanggang, Yao Nai, Shao Jinhan and Yu Ji with the Siku Quanshu General Bibliography, analyzes the historical and academic factors that affect the academic thought and methodology of the Siku Quanshu from the perspective of academic history and intellectual history, reveals and interprets the connotation and essence of the academic thought and methodology of the Siku Quanshu General Bibliography, and explains and evaluates the significance and value of its classical, historiographic, zhuzi and literary theories. This book combines examination and discussion, macro and micro complement each other, and strives to start from the basic materials and draw some new conclusions. The catalogue of ancient Chinese books is not limited to the survival and death of the classics of the past dynasties, but also reflects the development and evolution of scholarship throughout the ages, lists the context and source of academic development, and evaluates the character and academic advantages and disadvantages, short and long. The Siku Quanshu General Bibliography, the largest catalogue of ancient ancient books in ancient China, compiled in the Qianlong period of the Qing Dynasty, is a fine product of classical culture entering the stage of maturity and summary, which not only contains the trajectory of the generation and flow of ancient Chinese academic culture, but also contains the traditional Chinese academic cultural mentality and the spirit of cultural thought in the early Qing Dynasty, and contains rich academic ideas and academic methods. This book mainly compares and analyzes the manuscripts written by Weng Fanggang, Yao Nai, Shao Jinhan and Yu Ji with the Siku Quanshu General Bibliography, analyzes the historical and academic factors that affect the academic thought and methodology of the Siku Quanshu from the perspective of academic history and intellectual history, reveals and interprets the connotation and essence of the academic thought and methodology of the Siku Quanshu General Bibliography, and explains and evaluates the significance and value of its classical, historiographic, zhuzi and literary theories. This book combines examination and discussion, macro and micro complement each other, and strives to start from the basic materials and draw some new conclusions.(AI翻译)

置顶