图书
登录
注册
- 内容简介
- 书籍目录
陈天祥作《四书辨疑》，被时人认为是质疑朱学之作。陈氏此书，所质疑者不惟《集注》一书而已，亦有对经文本身的疑问和对前人注解的指摘。持论公允，摒除门户之见。虽质疑朱子之失，亦肯定朱子之得。故四库馆臣论此书曰“大意主于阙疑而不贵穿凿”“实非有意立异规为门户之争者”，评价此书无害于朱熹《四书章句集注》，可并存相参。应该说，《四书辨疑》是以朱熹《集注》为依托而延展开去对经文的探究，其目的不是要贬抑朱学，而是力图匡正朱学，使其更加符合经文旨意。
Chen Tianxiang's The Four Books in Doubt was regarded as a work of questioning Zhu Xue (朱学). In this book, Chen questioned not only the book “Collected Notes”, but also the questions about the scriptures themselves and the criticisms of previous commentaries. The argument is fair, and excludes the gateway view. Although questioning the loss of zhu zhuo, also sure zhu zhuo gain. Therefore, the four libraries of ministers of this book, “the main intention of the main in the queer doubt and not expensive chiseling,” “is not intended to set up different rules for the gateway to the controversy,” the evaluation of this book is not harmful to Zhu Xi, “the four books, chapters and sentences of the collection of notes”, can be coexisting with the same reference. It should be said, “the four books to identify doubt” is Zhu Xi “set of notes” as a basis for the extension to go to the scriptures of the inquiry, its purpose is not to depreciate Zhu, but seek to rectify Zhu, so that it is more in line with the purpose of the scriptures.
