图书
This book is an academic debate around the question of folklore fieldwork, focusing on the question of whether the scientific method, especially the experimental method, is applicable to humanistic research. This is a historical echo of the question of "whether science can solve the outlook on life" in the "Kexuan controversy" in the 20s of the 20th century, and the debate extended from the question of whether Kexuan was separated and whether science was omnipotent in the early years to the academic ethics and philosophy of science in the humanities, and the two sides launched a fierce debate on this. This online academic controversy, which is mainly limited to a group of young folklore scholars, is not limited to the discipline of folklore. The book is divided into three parts: the upper part is the "science and controversy", the middle part is the academic case of experimental research, and the second part is the academic paper written by folklorists who are obsessed with different points of view on scientific and ethical issues in fieldwork. The organizers of this book aim to advocate an experimental view of fieldwork: the field cannot only be a place of natural observation, but also a place of our experimental research. In the field, in addition to being able to pick up, but also to dig, in addition to observation, you can also experiment, and actively play the active role of researchers is the proper meaning of field research.
新中国民俗学研究70年
70 Years of Folklore Research in New China文艺复兴时期英国的博学好古研究与民族史书写
Learned Good Studies and Ethnohistorical Writing in Renaissance England中国民族地区经济社会调查报告:贡山独龙族怒族自治县卷
Economic and Social Survey Report on Ethnic Areas in China: Gongshan Dulong Nu Autonomous County Volume中国民族地区经济社会调查报告.生态卷
Report on Economic and Social Survey of Ethnic Areas in China. Ecology Volume钟敬文与中国民俗学派:钟敬文个案研究之三
Zhong Jingwen and the Chinese School of Folklore: Zhong Jingwen Case Study No.3
置顶