作为实验的田野研究：中国现代民俗学的“科玄论战”

内容简介

本书是一部围绕民俗学田野作业问题而展开的学术论争，论争焦点集中在“科学方法尤其是实验方法是否适用于人文研究”的问题。这是对20世纪20年代“科玄论战”中“科学究竟能否解决人生观”问题的一次历史呼应，论争从早年的科玄是否分家、科学是否万能的问题延伸到了人文学科的学术伦理与科学哲学的问题，科玄双方就此展开了激烈的论辩。这场主要局限于一批青年民俗学者的网络学术论战，其问题和意义却并不局限于民俗学科。

全书分为上中下三编，上编是唇枪舌剑的“科玄论战”，中编是实验研究的学术案例，下编是执着于不同观点的民俗学者就田野作业中科学与伦理问题而撰写的学术论文。本书整理者旨在提倡一种实验的田野研究观：田野不能仅仅是个自然观察的场所，也可以是我们实验研究的场所。在田野中，除了会捡，还要会挖，除了观察，还可实验，积极发挥研究者的能动作用是田野研究的题中应有之义。

This book is an academic debate around the question of folklore fieldwork, focusing on the question of whether the scientific method, especially the experimental method, is applicable to humanistic research. This is a historical echo of the question of "whether science can solve the outlook on life" in the "Kexuan controversy" in the 20s of the 20th century, and the debate extended from the question of whether Kexuan was separated and whether science was omnipotent in the early years to the academic ethics and philosophy of science in the humanities, and the two sides launched a fierce debate on this. This online academic controversy, which is mainly limited to a group of young folklore scholars, is not limited to the discipline of folklore. The book is divided into three parts: the upper part is the "science and controversy", the middle part is the academic case of experimental research, and the second part is the academic paper written by folklorists who are obsessed with different points of view on scientific and ethical issues in fieldwork. The organizers of this book aim to advocate an experimental view of fieldwork: the field cannot only be a place of natural observation, but also a place of our experimental research. In the field, in addition to being able to pick up, but also to dig, in addition to observation, you can also experiment, and actively play the active role of researchers is the proper meaning of field research.（AI翻译）

作者简介

施爱东:（整理）

施爱东，男，1968年生，理学学士，文学硕士、博士，先后任职于中山大学中文系、北京师范大学文学院博士后工作站，现为中国社会科学院文学研究所研究员、中国民俗学会副会长。主要研究方向为故事学、谣言学、民俗学学术史。代表性论著主要有《中国现代民俗学检讨》《倡立一门新学科：中国现代民俗学的鼓吹、经营与中落》《16-20世纪的龙政治与中国形象》等。