中文 English

图书详情

首页

英文文献

我的书架

当前位置: 首页 > 图书详情

中国司法公开新媒体应用研究报告:2015:从庭审网络与微博视频直播切入

支振锋[著]

传播媒介 影响 司法制度 研究报告 中国

2016-03-01

978-7-5161-7773-0

162

12

扫码阅读

  • 内容简介
  • 书籍目录
  • 作者简介
内容简介

本报告以《中华人民共和国宪法》《中华人民共和国人民法院组织法》以及诉讼法和最高法院相关司法文件为依据,对人民法院近年来的庭审网络及微博视频直播状况进行了初步考察,并与西方发达国家相关司法公开制度和实践进行了比较。结果显示,中国的司法公开已经走在国际前列,以庭审微博新媒体视频直播为代表的司法公开新举措,在某种程度上已经实现了对西方司法公开的弯道超车。其中,最高法院按照中央部署,以满足人民对司法公开的期待为目标,进行了大量重要的改革与推进;许多基层与中级人民法院表现出了可贵的创新精神。但由于制度供给依然不足、经费保障较为有限、技术标准不统一以及部分人士仍然需要继续解放思想等原因,中国在司法公开上仍然有很长的路要走。就此,本报告提出了针对性的政策建议。

Based on the Constitution of the People's Republic of China, the Organic Law of the People's Courts of the People's Republic of China, the Procedural Law and relevant judicial documents of the Supreme Court, this report makes a preliminary investigation of the trial network and microblog video live broadcast of the people's courts in recent years, and compares it with the relevant judicial openness systems and practices in Western developed countries. The results show that China's judicial openness has been at the forefront of the world, and the new measures of judicial openness, represented by the live video broadcast of court Weibo and new media, have to some extent achieved a curve overtaking of Western judicial openness. Among them, the Supreme Court has carried out a large number of important reforms and advances in accordance with the central deployment and with the goal of meeting the people's expectations for judicial openness; Many grassroots and intermediate people's courts have shown valuable innovative spirit. However, due to the still insufficient supply of systems, relatively limited funding guarantees, inconsistent technical standards, and the need for some people to continue to emancipate their minds, China still has a long way to go in judicial openness. In this regard, the report makes targeted policy recommendations.(AI翻译)

置顶