图书
登录
注册
-
中国主权财富投资的理论、问题与对策
张明
2015-07-01
978-7-5161-6172-2
279千字
投资基金 对外投资 研究 中国
本书具体写作分工如下：第一章：王永中、潘圆圆;第二章：张明、王永中、潘圆圆;第三、四、五和六章：王永中;第七章：王宇哲、张明;第八章：张明;第九章：潘圆圆、王永中、张明;第十章：潘圆圆、张明、王永中。
-
海上丝绸之路调研报告
A Field Investigation Report on the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road张明
2017-05-01
978-7-5203-0386-6
135千字
“一带一路” 国际合作 研究报告 英文
From both what happened in the United States and Europe and what the political economy perspective of the world would expect, anyone may predict a weakening trend of the economic globalization in at least the near future. That is, the predictable politics and economic policies in the western countries, which have been the major drivers of the previous wave of globalization, tend to drive down the economic globalization, alongside nationalism and populism dominate the policy-making of international trade and investment flows in a quite few countries.That trend does not necessarily mean a catastrophe for China’s economic growth, though it has benefited from the previous economic globalization. China will accomplish its goals of building a moderately prosperous society in all respects in 2020 and realizing its great rejuvenation in 2050, no matter what happens to the globalization. China, however, does hope that there will be a sound environment of international trade, capital flows, mobility of the talented, and other factors that economic globalization can bring in.As the beneficiary of the globalization, the second largest economy, a country trading the largest volume of commodities internationally, and other number ones, China is indeed willing to initiate and lead the potentially next wave of economic globalization. In addition, China is also obligated to seek a change in global system of governance on behave of its own, other developing countries, and other emerging markets. All those can help developing countries in general and emerging markets in particular to gain bigger say in global governance and bigger share of globalization dividends.The Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st Century Maritime Silk Road Initiative proposed by Chinese President Xi Jinping, taking ancient land and maritime silk road as a symbol, aims to develop economic collaboration relationships and partnerships with countries along the belt and road, build a community with political mutual trust, economic integration and cultural inclusion. This initiative covers the core of economic globalization, seeks to construct new global governance framework, and is expected to become the tipping point of next wave of economic globalization. It aims to link the Chinese domestic development to the world development, to push forward the collaboration of real economy and production capacity among countries, and to extend domestic pattern of transferring manufacturing from coastal to inland regions to international “flying geese paradigm”.Before the global system of governance fully changes to more represent interests of developing countries, the Belt and Road Initiative and its corresponding institutional arrangements, such as Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank can supplement the defects of the existing system. On the other hand, one should not forget that the Belt and Road Initiative’s original purpose, that is, serving to fill the worldwide financial gap in constructing infrastructure.Since the Belt and Road Initiative was proposed in 2013, over 100 countries and international organizations have responded positively, and 40 of them have signed cooperative agreements with China. Chinese enterprises’ investments in countries along the belt and road amount to more than 50 billion US dollars, which serves to facilitate a host of major projects, boom economic development and expand employment in host countries. As President Xi put it, while the Belt and Road Initiative comes from China, it benefits the world.In front of readers is a series of books, on the theme of the Belt and Road Initiative and its practices in various localities. Those books include(1) A Field Investigation Report on the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road; (2) The Alignment of the Silk Road Economic Belt and the Bright Road of Kazakhstan: Problems and Perspective; (3) The International Risk and Cooperative Space Expansion of the Belt and Road Initiative—the Example of Sri Lanka; (4) Port and Port Cities in Building of the Belt and Road; (5) Study on “21st Century Maritime Silk Road” Docking with “Global Maritime Fulcrum”: Research Report about Fujian Province of China and Indonesia; (6) Expanding the Belt and Road : A New Perspective on China—Latin America Integrated Cooperation;(7) The Construction and Development of Asia and Africa Economic Circle under the Belt and Road Perspective; (8) The Development in the Four Economic Corridors of Indian Ocean under the Chinese Belt and Road Perspective. I hope readers, both theorists and practitioners, will find them helpful.26Vice President of the Chinese Academy of Social ScienceBeijing, May 4, 2017
-
中国海外直接投资的利益保护机制研究
CHINA'S OVERSEAS INTERESTS Research on the Protection Mechanism of China's Outward Direct Investment Interests张明
2018-10-01
978-7-5203-3224-8
246千字
海外投资 权益保护 调查研究 中国
自2008年国际金融危机爆发以来，中国企业的对外直接投资迅速增长，然而各种投资受挫甚至失败的案例也频繁发生。全面总结中国企业海外投资的经验教训，研究如何更好地保护中国企业的海外投资利益，已成为一个迫切的课题。本书分为上、中、下三篇：上篇主要分析海外利益保护的相关理论，中篇着重分析中国海外投资面临的各种风险，下篇则是中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所国际投资研究室团队在2016年和2017年进行实地调研的直接成果。本书作者提出了保护中国海外直接投资利益的具体建议。
-
中国海外投资国家风险评级报告.2020
REPORT OF COUNTRY-RISK RATING OF OVERSEAS INVESTMENT FROM CHINA（CROIC-IWEP）（2020）张明
2020-06-01
978-7-5203-6669-4
178千字
海外投资 风险评价 研究报告 中国 2020
这是《中国海外投资国家风险评级报告》连续七年发布的最新版本。本报告从中国企业和主权财富的海外投资视角出发，构建经济基础、偿债能力、社会弹性、政治风险和对华关系五大指标，共42个子指标，涵盖114个国家和地区，量化评估中国企业海外投资面临的主要风险。与往年相比，2020年的报告新增汇率波动性指标，增加57个样本国家，采用缩尾处理方法规范异常值处理流程。从总体评级结果来看，发达经济体的经济基础较好，政治风险较低，社会弹性较高，偿债能力较强，整体投资风险低于新兴经济体。从“一带一路”沿线国家风险评级结果来看，“一带一路”沿线国家平均风险水平低于整体水平，中等风险国家居多。
-
中国海外投资国家风险评级报告.2020（英文）
Report of Country-risk Rating of Overseas Investment from China（2020）张明
2020-06-01
978-7-5203-6707-3
201千字
海外投资 风险评价 研究报告 中国 2020 英文
In 2018，China's stock of outbound direct investment（ODI）ranked the third place around the world，and flow of ODI ranked the second place. In addition，the share of China’s stock ODI in the world gets its historical record，as well as the flow of ODI. However，with the further aggravation of Sino-U.S. trade friction and the outbreak of COVID-19，the investment environment around the world is deteriorating，and the risks of overseas investment continues to rise. From the perspectives of enterprises and sovereign wealth，this report constructs 42 sub-indicators of five major indicators，which are Economic Foundation，Debt Repayment Capacity，Social Elasticity，Political Risk and China Relations. This 2020 Report covers 114 sample countries（regions），comprehensively and quantitatively assesses the major risks faced by Chinese enterprises in overseas investment. Compared with the previous versions，the 2020 Report extends the sample size and indicators，as well as improves the standardization of rating method. From the rating results，developed economy always has better Economic Foundation，lower Political Risk and stronger Debt Repayment Capacity. In general，overall investment risks in developed countries are lower than that in emerging economies. However，the developed countries’ scores in China Relations are lower than that of the emerging markets，even lower than in 2019. The uncertainty caused by Sino-U.S. trade frictions has further dampened Chinese investment in North America. The score of China Relations and the overall ranking of the U.S. have declined continually. For emerging economies，the scores of Economic Foundation and Political Risk are significantly lower than that of developed countries. However，the emerging economies have investment potentials with the investment demand. At present，the “One Belt and One Road” region has become a new growth point of China's ODI. Finally，we should emphasize that the risk of overseas investment in 2020 needs to be treated seriously.