中国政府信息公开第三方评估报告（2015）

图书

检索

图书详情

首页

英文文献

中国政府信息公开第三方评估报告（2015）

Third Party Assessment Report on the Disclosure of Government Information in China (2015)

作者：

中国社会科学院法学研究所

分类：

法学管理学行政管理，人事行政，财务行政，行政决策

关键词：

国家行政机关信息管理评估研究报告中国

出版日期：2016-05-01

ISBN：978-7-5161-8218-5

页数：229

点击量：6

立即阅读

扫码跳转手机端阅读

内容简介
书籍目录

内容简介

中国社会科学院法学研究所国家法治指数项目组长期关注中国法治发展、司法制度运行与司法改革，先后推出了《中国政府透明度》《中国司法透明度》《中国检务透明度》《浙江法院阳光司法》《北京法院阳光司法》《中国高等教育透明度》等系列指数年度报告，以及《基本解决执行难评估报告：以深圳市中级人民法院为样本》《司法透明国际比较》《人民论坛·浙江法院特辑》等成果。

本报告系受国务院办公厅政府信息与政务公开办公室委托，对55家国务院部门、31家省级政府、93家地市级政府公开政府信息的情况进行评估的分析报告。评估发现，2015年，各地区各部门加大信息发布、政策解读和热点回应力度，注重公开效果，取得明显进步。但也存在一些有代表性的共性问题，如重视程度有待提升，部分重点领域信息公开不到位，部分领域公开标准不明不细，应公开尽公开、应上网尽上网工作落实不到位，答复申请的随意性仍较大、被复议诉讼隐患多等。

The National Rule of Law Index Project Team of the Law Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences has long paid attention to the development of China's rule of law, the operation of the judicial system and judicial reform, and has successively launched a series of annual reports on indices such as "Chinese Government Transparency", "China Judicial Transparency", "China Procuratorial Transparency", "Zhejiang Court Sunshine Justice", "Beijing Court Sunshine Justice", "China Higher Education Transparency" and other index annual reports, as well as "Basic Settlement of Implementation Difficulties Assessment Report: Taking Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court as a Sample", "International Comparison of Judicial Transparency", "People's Forum · Zhejiang Court Special" and other achievements. This report is commissioned by the Office of Government Information and Open Government Affairs of the General Office of the State Council to evaluate the disclosure of government information by 55 State Council departments, 31 provincial-level governments, and 93 prefecture-level and city-level governments. The evaluation found that in 2015, all regions and departments increased information release, policy interpretation and hot spot response, paid attention to the effect of disclosure, and made significant progress. However, there are also some representative common problems, such as the degree of attention needs to be improved, the information disclosure in some key areas is not in place, the disclosure standards in some areas are unclear and detailed, the work of making all disclosures and online should be made is not in place, the arbitrariness of responding to applications is still large, and there are many hidden dangers of litigation under reconsideration.