当代中国敦煌学研究：1949

图书

检索

图书详情

首页

英文文献

当代中国敦煌学研究：1949—2019

Research on Dunhuang Studies in Contemporary China （1949-2019）

作者：

郝春文宋雪春武绍卫

分类：

历史学专门史，经济史文化史

关键词：

敦煌学研究

出版日期：2020-11-01

ISBN：978-7-5203-7277-0

页数：546

点击量：64

立即阅读

扫码跳转手机端阅读

内容简介
书籍目录

内容简介

本书分四个阶段回顾了中国敦煌学研究发展的历程。第一阶段以1930年为界分为两个时期。即1909年至1930年为第一个时期，这是敦煌学兴起的时期。1931年至1949年中华人民共和国建立是第二个时期，其特点是我国学者所接触的敦煌文献大为增多，研究领域也逐步扩大。第二个阶段（1949年至1978年）则以1966年“文化大革命”开始划分为两个时期。前一时期研究的重心在大陆，后一时期研究重心转移到了港台地区。1978年改革开放后至2000年是第三阶段，是我国敦煌学的快速发展时期，中国学者逐渐改变了“敦煌在中国，敦煌学在日本”局面，并最终掌握了国际敦煌学的主导权和话语权。第四个阶段（2001年至2019年）是我国敦煌学开始转型的阶段，我国学者在延续传统题目和传统方法、范式的同时，开始着力探索用新范式和新视角开辟敦煌学的新领域。本书的撰述采用学术史式，力图分析所涉及论著的成就、特点和不足，力图展示所涉及的论著在相关研究历程和学术脉络中的地位。

This book reviews the development of Dunhuang studies in China in four stages. The first phase was divided into two periods, bounded by 1930. That is, 1909 to 1930 is the first period, which is the period of the rise of Dunhuang Studies. The establishment of the People's Republic of China from 1931 to 1949 was the second period, which was characterized by a great increase in the number of Dunhuang documents exposed by Chinese scholars, and the gradual expansion of the field of research. The second phase (1949-1978) was divided into two periods, beginning with the Cultural Revolution in 1966. In the former period, the focus of research was on the mainland, and in the latter period, the focus of research shifted to Hong Kong and Taiwan. After the reform and opening up in 1978 to 2000, the third stage was the period of rapid development of Dunhuang studies in China, and Chinese scholars gradually changed the situation of "Dunhuang in China, Dunhuang studies in Japan", and finally mastered the dominance and discourse power of international Dunhuang studies. The fourth stage (2001-2019) is the stage when Dunhuang studies in China began to transform, and Chinese scholars began to explore new paradigms and perspectives to open up new fields of Dunhuang studies while continuing traditional topics and traditional methods and paradigms. The writing of this book adopts the academic historical style, trying to analyze the achievements, characteristics and shortcomings of the works involved, and trying to show the position of the relevant works in the relevant research process and academic context.