图书
《中国智库综合评价AMI研究报告(2017)》力求在综合考虑不同类型智库之间差异的前提下,研创兼顾整体通用性与差异性的“中国智库综合评价AMI指标体系”,在进一步梳理国内智库发展现状的基础上,深化对中国智库全面客观的综合评价,并依据该体系及相关权重,以参评机构所提供的数据为基础,采取定量与定性相结合的分析方法进行评价,最终汇总形成《中国智库综合评价AMI研究报告(2017)》
The AMI Research Report on Comprehensive Evaluation of Chinese Think Tanks (2017) strives to develop a "Chinese Think Tank Comprehensive Evaluation AMI Indicator System" that takes into account the differences between different types of think tanks, and to deepen the comprehensive evaluation of China's think tanks on the basis of the current situation of the development of domestic think tanks.On the basis of further sorting out the current situation of the development of domestic think tanks, we deepened the comprehensive and objective evaluation of Chinese think tanks, and based on the system and the relevant weights, and based on the data provided by the participating organisations, we conducted the evaluation by adopting a combination of quantitative and qualitative analytical methods, and ultimately compiled and formed the "Chinese Think Tanks Comprehensive Evaluation AMI Research Report (2017)".
组织管理的逻辑:基于中国企业实践的系统思考
The Logic of Organizational Management: A Systematic Reflection Based on Chinese Corporate Practice重新设计工作:基本心理需要、内在动机与激励
Work Redesign:Basic Psychological Needs,Intrinsic Motivation and Incentives中国,一点都不能少:跨国企业遵守“一个中国”原则状况观察
CHINA,NOT EVEN A BIT CAN BE LEFT BEHIND:AN OBSERVATION ON THE COMPLIANCE WITH ONE-CHINA PRINCIPLE BY TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS中国批创思维发展报告.2015年卷
Report on the Development of Critical Thinking in China. 2015 Volume规制之手:中国建设工程领域政府与行政审批中介关系
The Hand of Regulation:Relations between Government and Administrative Approval Intermediaries in China's Construction Field
置顶