Han Qingxiang (Vice President of China Marx and Engels Research Association, Professor and Doctoral Supervisor of the Party School of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China) presided over the 2008 National Social Science Foundation project "Research on Paradigm Innovation and Practical Tension of Scientific Outlook on Development" presided over by Professor Luo Xiaomei, academic leader of Chongqing Marxism Sinicization Research and vice president of the Party School of Chongqing Municipal Committee of the Communist Party of China, which was successfully completed with good results after expert review organized by the National Office of Philosophy and Social Science Planning. The project was published under the title of "Research on Paradigm Innovation of Scientific Outlook on Development". The project has carried out a comprehensive study on the paradigm innovation of the scientific outlook on development, and is an active attempt to organically unify practical rationality and academic rationality, and the project research has achieved great success. For a long time, people seem to have formed an illusion in the understanding of perceptual cognition and rational cognition: practice is emotional, and rationality is the result of a leap in understanding after the completion of practical action. In fact, the difference between perceptual cognition and rational cognition lies not in the relationship with practical actions or succession, or in the distance and proximity, but in the level of truth understanding contained or achieved by the cognitive results themselves. Therefore, the existence "field" of rationality can be both academic achievements and a process that runs through practical actions. Academic rationality in the form of academic achievements is the way in which reason or truth exists that people are more familiar with and recognized. Although academic rationality in the form of academic achievements is also divided into various fields of study and discipline, its academic expression is also different, as Engels said in his letter to F. Merlin in 1893, although each discipline has its own special research fields and objects; However, the facts of special research fields and objects have been based on the "academic accumulation" of the research results of previous generations who have exhausted their life's energy, so the academic rationality in the form of academic achievements that people see is the logical framework of concepts, and its "academic flavor is so strong", the facts of those special research fields and objects seem to be "shielded". Regarding rationality for action, it was Coleman who first proposed the concept. He believes that the goal of rational action is to provide a theory of social action based on individual rationality, and in doing so to combine macro and micro theories of sociology. In the 90s of the 20th century, Chinese academics divided rationality into three types: cognitive rationality, practical rationality and evaluative rationality, believing that practical rationality is people's self-improvement in practice and their ability to judge practice itself. "Action" and "practice" are interchangeable concepts. On this point, Engels had an incisive discussion in the fourth chapter of "Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of German Classical Philosophy" when he talked about the difference between the blind drive of nature and the dynamic of social practice. In short, there is an academic basis for proposing rationality in action or rationality in practice. It is worth noting that in the more than 100 years of development of Marxist theory with the times, it has in fact formed a distinction between academic rationality and practical rationality. The research results of Marx, the founder of Marxism, are a model of the perfect unity of academic reason and practical reason. Marx's works not only have standard normative academic concepts, structures and logic, but also have a clear pertinence and penetrating power to practical problems. Marx's ability to achieve the perfect unity of academic rationality and practical rationality of research results is a model of subjective and objective conditions. It is the normative structure and logical force of Marxist scholarship that makes its theory highly scientific; It is precisely Marxism's attention to practical problems and its penetrating power that gives its theory a remarkable practical character. Beginning with Lenin, the focus of Marxism shifted from the theory of creation and propaganda to the use of this theory to solve the problems of revolution and construction in specific national conditions and its world environment, and to innovate and develop the theory in the practice of solving the practical problems of revolution and construction. In the face of complex and changeable problems in revolution or construction, Marxist academic rationality will inevitably give way to practical reason, that is, to innovate practical rationality in response to the needs of major problems that need to be solved urgently. This is what Mao Zedong said, the purpose of theory is all about application, about solving practical problems. Further, this period is the question of how to concretize Marxism. As Mao Zedong emphasized in his report to the Sixth Plenary Session of the Sixth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in 1938: "To concretize Marxism in China and to make it carry in every expression the necessary Chinese characteristics, that is, to apply it in accordance with Chinese characteristics, has become an urgent problem for the whole Party to understand and solve." 2539664 this is the stage of rational action that combines the basic principles of Marxism with the concrete revolutionary practice of each country. The success of the October Revolution in Russia and the founding of the People's Republic of China ushered in a new era of Communist Party rule. In various research institutions and universities, a large number of scholars specializing in Marxist theoretical education, propaganda and research have begun, and their Marxist theoretical research results obviously have the common characteristics of normative academic achievements, which can also be called "academic rationality". Academic rationality and practical rationality have their own advantages. Academic rationality can objectively be identified as "academic" because of its historical inheritance, especially the normative nature of theoretical form and the profundity of its content and its logic, and its influence will last once it is accepted. Of course, the flaw of academic rationality is that it is easily affected by the "barriers" of disciplines and has limitations. Practical rationality has a rich academic foundation and tension, the most important is the effectiveness of solving practical major problems, coupled with the ability to mobilize a wide range of communication means for propaganda and the use of political and administrative system forces to quickly influence practice, and its "guiding role" is beyond the reach of academic reason. Of course, the flaws of practical reason itself cannot be avoided, mainly because its theoretical foundation and tension have not been fully explored and displayed, coupled with the means of dissemination and influence are not the logical power of the theory itself, and its influence is not difficult to deepen and sustain. The application and development of Marxism in practice has formed a distinction between academic reason and practical reason, which is inevitable to a certain extent. However, it is worth paying attention to how to ensure that the achievements of Marxist academic reason and practical reason do not become things that are always separated from each other or even opposites, so that they can be connected and mutually reinforced in practice, and jointly promote the Chineseization, modernization, and popularization of Marxist theory. Consciously realizing the organic unity of Marxist academic rationality and practical rationality innovation achievements is an important path and measure to realize the Chineseization, eraization and popularization of Marxism. As scholars, we should shoulder our responsibilities and make practical efforts to this end. Studying the paradigm innovation and practical tension of the scientific outlook on development is a useful attempt to fulfill such responsibilities and make such efforts. The academic theoretical achievement of "Research on Paradigm Innovation of Scientific Outlook on Development" has three noteworthy academic contributions in promoting the formation of interconnected and mutually reinforcing organic unity between the innovative achievements of Marxist theoretical academic rationality and practical rationality: First, the topic has carried out academic re-research on the scientific outlook on development through the innovation of research methods. The results of the project put the scientific outlook on development on the basis of the Marxist practical materialist world view, and then introduced Kuhn's paradigm innovation research method, and carried out academic re-research of the scientific outlook on development. The Scientific Outlook on Development is the strategic thinking of socialism with Chinese characteristics put forward by the CPC Central Committee with Hu Jintao as general secretary in accordance with the new phased characteristics of modernization in the 21st century. The first meaning of the scientific outlook on development is development, the core is people-oriented, the basic requirement is comprehensive, coordinated and sustainable, and the fundamental method is to take into account all aspects. Its essence is to achieve the good and rapid development of socialism with Chinese characteristics. As a strategic thought, the Scientific Outlook on Development is a major theoretical achievement of our party's understanding and generalization of socialism with Chinese characteristics, and has profound connotations. Therefore, in-depth academic interpretation of its theoretical connotation and scientific essence is an important prerequisite for practicing the scientific outlook on development, and it is also a major responsibility of theorists. I think that the authors of "Research on Paradigm Innovation in the Scientific Outlook on Development" are diligent in their exploration with this conscious awareness. Every era needs a large number of such diligent explorers, not to mention that we are in such a great era, this era requires us to constantly carry out theoretical innovation. Only by conducting in-depth research on the strategic idea of the Scientific Outlook on Development can the solid academic foundation and academic tension of the Scientific Outlook on Development be further highlighted, and can people's understanding of the Scientific Outlook on Development be deepened, so as to enhance their consciousness of deeply implementing the Scientific Outlook on Development. Secondly, this topic uses the academic analysis tool of "theoretical hardcore" to explore the logical framework of the theory of scientific outlook on development. The report of the 17th CPC National Congress expounded on the formation of the theory of the scientific outlook on development and the main theoretical content. On this basis, the research results of the project use the academic analysis tool of "theoretical hardcore" to conduct academic discussions on the relationship between the scientific outlook on development, Deng Xiaoping Theory and the important thinking of "three represents" and advancing with the times. At the same time, the academic analysis tool of "theoretical hardcore" is used to conduct academic arguments on the orderly and inseparable relationship and significance between the main theoretical contents of the scientific outlook on development. This exploration of research paths will help reveal the inherent and intrinsic logical force of the scientific outlook on development and help overcome the long-standing simplistic understanding of the party's innovation theory. Finally, this topic explores the "domain boundary" of the practical tension of the party's innovation theory. There is no doubt that the Party's innovative theory with the characteristics of "practical rationality" has a tremendous guiding effect on practice. However, is there a "territorial boundary" to the practical tension of the party's innovation theory? In the past, there was very little discussion of this issue, so that there were two extreme thinking of "anything can guide" or "no specific problem can be solved". To say that "anything can be guided" is an irresponsible exaggeration or "killing" of the practical tension of the party's innovative theory; To say that "no specific problem can be solved" is to despise or deny the practical tension of the party's theory of innovation. The research results of the project believe that the "domain boundary" of the practical tension of the party's innovation theory is a strategic issue at the strategic level. The results believe that "promoting the level of development", "promoting social harmony", "practicing urban-rural coordination", and "establishing China's image as a responsible major country" are the four aspects that deserve the most attention in the practical tension of the scientific outlook on development in China's modernization construction in the 21st century. Clearly, these findings are illuminating. It is the duty entrusted to us by the times to explore and handle the relationship between academic rationality and practical reason, to re-study practical rationality at the academic level, and to highlight the theoretical background and practical tension of the scientific outlook on development. It is precisely from this angle that we can see that the efforts of Professor Luo Xiaomei and other comrades are of great significance! May more people work together to do this well!（AI翻译）