图书
登录
注册
- 内容简介
- 书籍目录
- 作者简介
- 参考文献
One of the most prominent features of Marxist philosophy is its emphasis on the importance of practice. This emphasis on practice is embodied not only in a world view of practical materialist philosophy, but also in a vision and method of theoretical research on all things in the world. For Marx, the abstraction and concreteness of "practice" are dialectically unified. Practice is not only the source of theory, but also the natural destination of theoretical research. Returning philosophy to the "human world", paying attention to the real life practice of human beings, the actual practice of the country and the nation, the actual production and life practice of each of us, and the pursuit of the ultimate rational reflection on it is not only an important embodiment of the inheritance of the spirit of Marxist philosophy by contemporary philosophers, but also an important innovative way of contemporary Marxist philosophical theory. One of the most important practices in contemporary China is to comprehensively deepen reform. Reform, opening up and development have been important themes in Chinese society since 1978. Forty years ago, the discussion that "practice is the only criterion for testing truth" as the starting point triggered China's ideological emancipation and also triggered great progress and historic changes in China's economy, politics, society and culture. The past 40 years have been 40 years of extremely important changes in the world pattern, and 40 years of historic and tremendous changes in Chinese society. One of the most prominent features of this change is that not only has China's overall economy jumped to the second place in the world, but also in the process of learning from history and the world in an all-round way, the diversity of internal factors and structures of Chinese society has been greatly developed, and the "diversity" of the whole world is more prominent in Chinese society. "Diversity" is a natural embodiment of the existence of diversity in nature, but there has never been an era in which this "diversity" has been so deeply and "colorful" in China as it is today. It is precisely the "richness" of China's actual practice that makes each of our understanding of ourselves, the country, and society more complex. How to understand and deal with the tension between the individual and collective understanding of different members of society on social change, especially how to reach a better consensus on comprehensively deepening reform, has become an important issue in contemporary China's national governance. Dr. Zelin Zhao came to the Department of Philosophy of Huazhong University of Science and Technology and used me as a postdoctoral co-supervisor to carry out postdoctoral research. On the one hand, he actively participated in the green GDP performance evaluation research of the National Governance Research Institute, and successively obtained funding from two national postdoctoral science funds, cooperated with me or published more than ten academic papers and consulting papers and three research reports, which played an irreplaceable role in the research and writing of Hubei and national green GDP performance evaluation reports, and his achievements have won many awards. On the other hand, Dr. Zelin Zhao continues to deepen and expand the existing academic and rational research in artificial intelligence philosophy, Marxist epistemology, green development, etc., especially actively discussing contemporary epistemological issues such as reform consensus, and formed a postdoctoral outbound report "Reform Consensus Theory: China's History and Reflection". Through the historical recounting of the major ideological debates on "reform" in different periods in the 40 years of China's socialist reform and opening up, the author has unique ingenuity, selected "reform" as the starting point, focused on the differences of opinion and consensus on socialist reform in China, the history and logic of the emergence and development of reform consensus, and put forward China's basic thinking on condensing the consensus on socialist reform in the new era. What is displayed is a magnificent picture of the magnificent waves of China's socialist reform. In the narration and theoretical exposition of various historical events, the author can not only feel the complex and profound social changes in China in the past 40 years, but also touch the different temperatures of the historical pulse of China's socialist reform in the past 40 years; It can not only feel the historical understanding of China's socialist reform by different members of society under different social circumstances, but also feel more or less the difficult and thrilling major historical decisions made by national decision-makers in the face of complex social situations. We can not only feel the brilliant achievements of China's socialist reform after difficult exploration, but also feel the rational understanding that China's socialist reform will still have a long way to go after 40 years. The practice of China's reform and opening up over the past 40 years has taught us a truth: Only socialism can save China, and only reform and opening up can develop China, socialism and Marxism. Socialism with contemporary Chinese characteristics has entered a new era, forming a five-in-one overall layout of economic construction, political construction, cultural construction, social construction and ecological civilization construction, and forming a strategic layout of comprehensively building a moderately prosperous society, comprehensively deepening reform, comprehensively governing the country according to law, and comprehensively administering the party strictly. At the same time, we must also be soberly aware that in the process of accelerating the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and building a prosperous, strong, democratic, civilized, harmonious and beautiful modern socialist country, we will always face the problem of constantly diverging opinions to varying degrees and constantly condensing consensus on socialist reform. This phenomenon is not a "Chinese patent", let alone a "socialist patent", but a positive embodiment of "pluralism" after the transformation of the entire human society from a traditional society to a modern pluralistic society, and is an important manifestation of the continuous progress of human social history. In the face of the new era, guiding the people to rationally express their opinions on reform and actively face the positive demands of different members of society is an important path for the Chinese people to condense the consensus on socialist reform in the new era and form a joint force for reform, and it is also an important content for the Chinese people to promote the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity in the new era. This year marks the 200th anniversary of Marx's birth and the 170th anniversary of the publication of the Communist Manifesto, the 40th anniversary of China's socialist reform and opening up, and also an important beginning year for Chinese society to enter a new era. The socialist reforms that have been carried out in China, as well as the socialist reforms and innovations that are being carried out and about to be carried out, are allowing China to experience the most extensive, profound and unique social changes and practical innovations. This practice, and the social change and innovation brought about by it, are also providing more abundant practical materials and theoretical innovation space for theorists. As the author's preliminary exploration of the consensus on socialist reform in China, this book has the beginning significance, but it is far from exhaustive. How to reflect more deeply on the historical logic of China's socialist reform and how to extract a more universal theoretical understanding from the historical practice of China's socialist reform is still a major theoretical and practical issue worthy of in-depth consideration by contemporary theoretical workers, including the author, and of course, it is also an important historical mission of contemporary Marxist philosophers, and it is also an important growth point for innovation in Marxist philosophical theory. Zhao Zelin's postdoctoral outbound report was reviewed by Professor Wang Yuchen, Professor Ye Zexiong, Professor Dong Shangwen, Professor Lei Ruipeng, Professor Wang Xiaosheng, Professor Wu Wei, Professor Wan Xiaolong, Professor Chen Gang and me, and also received strong support from many famous experts in party history. As his postdoctoral co-supervisor, talking about the above experience is not only an exchange and discussion, but also an expectation and wish, and I believe that he can achieve more fruitful results and make greater contributions in the combination of theory and practice. Dean of the National Governance Research Institute of Huazhong University of Science and Technology Ouyang Kang, September 8, 2018（AI翻译）
