On the road to the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, relying on the "trinity" Chinese model composed of Chinese roads, Chinese theories and Chinese systems is of great importance. As part of this, vocational education is the same. The problem is that in China's more than 100 years of "modernization", "Western discourse" has gradually dominated the local model, which has led to a "rupture" in natural processes, including vocational education. In other words, the "Chinese discourse" of vocational education is obscured or even lost as a whole, but the "Western discourse" cannot solve the Chinese problem in the end, and the internal difficulties of China's vocational education are highlighted one by one, which is one of the key factors. Therefore, the basic framework of craftsmen, craftsmanship and craftsmanship in traditional society is clarified, that is, the logical starting point and genetic genealogy of the "Chinese discourse" of vocational education are reconstructed. Although it is different from it, it is quite inspired by the "Xia Shang and Zhou Dynasty Project", which is why it is named after it. Craftsmen, i.e. craftsmen. This study attempts to go beyond this conventional understanding and introduce the policy regulation of the "four people's division of industries" of the pre-Qin pipes, including the four parts of taxi, agriculture, industry and commerce. The key to this is that, compared with Confucianism, the "four professions" are mostly inheritance of skills. Interpreted in modern terms, it is mostly composed of "technical knowledge", "silent knowledge" or "practical knowledge". After the Qin and Han dynasties, "shi" became a synonym for intellectuals, so only some of them fell into this category, and they were called "craftsmen". Farmers, workers, and merchants are different from "craftsmen" and are completely attributed to the common people who have mastered the skills of the trade. The rise and fall of various industries is closely related to the cultural background of agricultural civilization, which is highlighted at the level of science policy, agricultural policy, industrial policy, and business policy. Just as there is a difference between "the end of agriculture and commerce" and "the benefits of agricultural business", the results are naturally different. Just as the long-term "agriculture-based" strategy has led to the invention of agronomy from the three emperors and five emperors to the end of the Qing Dynasty, and although the skill of merchants began in the Shang Dynasty and developed in the Tang and Song Dynasties, it has entered the Ming and Qing Dynasties when it was brilliant. When it comes to craftsmen, the traditional "craftsmanship" system cannot be surpassed. It would be unfair to regard the "craftsmanship" system merely as "enslavement", in a certain sense, the "craftsmanship" system is essential to ensure the "family transmission" of skills. From the beginning of Xia Yu, the development of the Shang Dynasty, to the mature Western Zhou Dynasty, the system of "occupation as a clan, industry clan residence" gradually became a culture, and became the accumulation of customs of the "craftsmanship" system. It can be said that the favor for "craftsmen" since the Shang Dynasty has been prevalent throughout the feudal historical period. Of course, the waste needs to be analyzed. The problem is that Confucian classics such as "The University", "The Mean", "Analects" and "Mencius" are familiar to the world, but few people know about the Eastern Zhou "Kaogongji" and the Song Dynasty's "Building French Style". In fact, as Wu Guosheng revealed in The Course of Science: "There are two traditions that promote the progress of human civilization, one is the tradition of philosophers and the other is the tradition of craftsmen. 4565897 that's the point of the Craftsman section. Craftsmanship, that is, the system design of craftsmen's production and skill inheritance. This study mainly follows two main lines. One is the main line of the industry, that is, the difference in the inheritance system between different industries, such as the "persuasion of farmers" of agricultural inheritance and the "apprenticeship" of industrial inheritance; The second is the main line of skill characteristics, that is, the difference between the inheritance system between skills with different characteristics, just as folk crafts generally adopt "jiqiu succession" or "apprenticeship", and official crafts are "apprenticeship". Traditional Chinese medicine and art rely on specialized vocational schools, such as China's first vocational school, "Hongdumenxue". There are both commonalities and personalities between the various systems, which are explained in modern terms, that is, "integration of industry and education" and "teaching, learning and doing" constitute the common characteristics of all systems. However, there are different differences, such as the "teacher culture" of the "apprenticeship", the "domain of human life" of the official system, and the "name of the worker" of the apprenticeship. The problem is that even in the handicraft era, the system of training craftsmen was so rich, so it was naturally inappropriate to completely dominate the world with the "school system" in modern times. At present, the exploration of "modern apprenticeship" in the world is a "return" to the tradition of vocational education. The valuable experience of predecessors cannot be ignored by the academic community, which is one of the logical starting points for the current design of modern vocational education system system. It is only that the traditional system that exists "hidden" by the people needs to undergo "modernization" reform, and then build a local vocational education system framework in the tension between tradition and modernity. Craftsmanship, that is, "craftsman spirit". It is crucial to "Made in China 2025". In a certain sense, China can refer to the advanced craftsmanship of Japan and Germany, but it cannot copy the entire craftsman system, as a historical and cultural existence, especially the "craftsman spirit" in the meantime. When talking about German Industry 4.0, every time the German "craftsman spirit" is quoted, which is not only caused by the "Western discourse" in the process of long-term "modernization", but also shows that the German "craftsman spirit" has never stopped the pace of natural modernization, so that tradition and modern industry are integrated. To support "Made in China 2025", China's "craftsman spirit" is required, so it is necessary to strip out the local and traditional "craftsman spirit" as the starting point in the cover of "Western discourse", in the inheritance of folk crafts, and in historical and cultural accounts. Based on the mastery of detailed craftsmen and craftsmanship materials, this study reveals the framework of China's local "craftsman spirit" composed of the channel of general art, both virtue and art, restoration and mediocrity, strong and humble sincerity, and people's livelihood. Compared with the West, there are three characteristics, that is, the special qualities manifested in the dimensions of direction, orientation and belief. In terms of direction, the European "craftsmanship" eventually leads to science, and the Chinese "craftsmanship" eventually leads to art; In terms of orientation, the European "craftsmanship" eventually developed a "careerist" 4565898 that regarded "occupation" as a vocation, while the Chinese "craftsmanship" eventually conformed to the "way" of nature; As far as faith is concerned, the European "craftsmanship" eventually converts to God, while the Chinese "craftsmanship" ultimately embodies the feelings of home and country. The two have their own characteristics and are difficult to distinguish. Of course, revealing this framework is not the ultimate goal, but rather a logical beginning on the road to conscious modernization. This research is a "traditional" part of the Chinese discourse of vocational education, which is a panoramic and factual description, although it is mostly an individual interpretation, but does not deliberately make personal subjective value judgments, so its value belongs more to the level of literature. However, the value of history is not limited to the function of documents, because "history" is the logical starting point of "reality", and "reality" is the continuation of "history". The research does not stop there, and will focus on the research of China's vocational education "generation-breaking project", which is the foundation of which this book is the foundation. At the time of planning the layout of the article, this research was inspired by the American scholar Sanders' book "The Craftsman", so the three parts of craftsman, craftsmanship and craftsmanship were used to build the basic framework of traditional Chinese vocational education - genetic genealogy, but did not copy the book's blind "narrative" method, but had many elements of individual "construction". However, due to the limitations of my historical accomplishment and understanding of vocational education, it is inevitable that there will be errors and biases, please criticize and correct the academic circles! Author: June 2017 in Jiangcheng（AI翻译）